At
29 inches 1-year-old tall Tyler Lewchuck is a little on the small
side…
Baby Chaz Bush, however, is a towering 32 inches.
“95 th percentile in weight and 97 th percentile in height,” says
his mom, Veda Bush.
Interesting trivia for the baby book…
But… according to Finnish research published in the Archives
of Disease in Childhood, it could mean much more.
“The study suggests that children who were taller at one
year of age (split to 1:01:09) “Seem to do better in life,” says
pediatrician Karen Dewling, M.D.
The study looked at adult males born between 1934 and 1944. Those
who were 31 and a half inches tall or more at the age of one, ended
up better educated and had better jobs.
The shortest babies were the least educated and the most likely
to work as manual laborers.
“I don’t think you can say that tall people are smarter
and more successful,” says Dr. Dewling.
What you can say, she says, is that in the depression years… babies
who grew better sometimes meant those were babies who got better
nutrition.
“And that is true not just for height growth but for brain
growth. And if you have better brain growth, you’ll have
a higher intelligence and perhaps be more successful in life,” says
Dr. Dewling.
Today, she says, despite better nutrition, what lingers is a
bias against short people…
“And could those kinds of things in life over and over
again harm someone’s self-esteem and make them take a more
menial job… I suppose there could be some of that.”
She says luckily… that’s something parents can
change.
Tylers mom Stacey Lewchuck agrees. “I think if you raise him
with good self-esteem and you know, good values, you’re going
to overcome whatever shortcoming you might have. I mean if it’s
your height or your weight, if you’re good at what you do… that’s
all that matters.” |